Base your contracts on measurable commitments
Starting from the winning bid and your call for tenders, Transparence ensures that the clauses and deliverables of your contract can be transposed into milestones designed to make tracking, execution and validation of the project easier.
The strength of a contract lies in its clarity and its degree of precision
When the deliverables described in a contract are vague and non-measurable, the risks of misunderstandings and cost overruns are high. Transparence solves this problem with a smart contract that suggests wording designed to make validation and tracking of digital projects easier.
- Clarify hard-to-validate clauses before the project starts
- Link every commitment to the validator that will confirm it
- Avoid the misunderstandings, disputes and lawsuits caused by interpretation errors
Building a smart contract
The contract is imported or built
You choose the starting point.
The AI clarifies and structures
Every obscure clause is flagged and every deliverable is transposed into measurable elements.
The AI proposes validators
It distinguishes what can be validated automatically and proposes the validator suited to each criterion.
You choose what to apply
You can accept, reject or edit the measures proposed by the AI.
You activate
As soon as the contracting authority and the supplier approve, the contract is activated and the audit registry starts.
You have questions? We have the answers
Here you will find the questions that come up most often when turning a contract into measurable commitments in Transparence. If yours is not covered in this section, do not hesitate to contact us directly.
It is your usual contract, except that each commitment has been broken down into milestones and measurable elements that can be tracked in real time in Transparence.
Where a traditional contract merely describes intentions, the smart contract ensures that as many promises as possible can be verified with validators and judged objectively. For example, "a high-performing portal" could become "monthly availability of at least 99.5%, measured continuously".
The platform flags it and proposes more precise wording that you are free to apply, edit or dismiss.
This is often where disputes are decided: a commitment left vague does not clarify itself as the project unfolds. Clarifying it now means taking a few extra minutes to potentially avoid interpretation disagreements that will cost dozens of hours later.
A validator is the tool that confirms a criterion has been met, used mostly at the automated validation step. For example, a deployment validator verifies that a service is online, a test validator confirms the required coverage, a visual validator compares a deliverable to the approved mockup, and so on.
As owner of the platform, you have your own registry of validators that can be assigned to commitments. This registry is extensible, meaning you can have new validators certified as needed. In theory, with the right validator, virtually any commitment in a digital project can be confirmed, including for example a sensor attesting that a physical structure was built to standard.
The contract is only activated once it is approved by the contracting authority and by the supplier. Both sides of the project see exactly the same milestones, the same criteria and the same validators.
For the supplier, clarifying the commitments is actually an advantage: it knows precisely what it will be evaluated on and is spared the anxiety of grey areas. It is a way to protect its work while reassuring the client about execution.
That is expected and accepted, because like it or not, in real life there are limits to what can be automated. The platform actually helps you distinguish what can be validated automatically from what cannot yet. For elements that are hard to clarify or to validate automatically, either a validator is added to the registry, or the commitment remains tracked through a manual human approval.
Not everything has to be automatable on day one. What matters is the philosophy the tool promotes: every commitment is designed to be explicitly tied to a verification method rather than left to after-the-fact judgment.
As soon as the contract is activated. Its generation, its approval by the contracting authority, its approval by the supplier and then its activation are recorded in a timestamped, cryptographically signed audit log that is tamper-proof and exportable, on a blockchain with post-quantum encryption.
In other words, the registry does not start the day a problem arises: it exists from the very first commitment. At the next step, each validation will simply be added to it.
A clear commitment protects both parties
Commitment clarification is the moment when promises become verifiable obligations and when the success factors are maximized. The contracting authority and the supplier both gain a common foundation to work together, as partners.
For the contracting authority
Contract manager, project management office
- Commitments made measurable
- A source of truth other than the supplier's word
- An activity registry that starts as soon as the contract is activated
For the selected supplier
Bidder turned contract holder
- An exact view of what it will be evaluated on, with the same criteria and validators as the client
- Compliant work protected by objective validation rather than subjective judgment
- Payments that can be tied to confirmed milestones
One hour is enough to turn one of your contracts into measurable commitments
Rather than a generic demonstration, we can take one of your already signed contracts and show you concretely the map of milestones, criteria and validators the platform would have drawn from it, in complete confidentiality.